mad, bad, & dangerous to know — What's your opinion on there being "fake" and...

1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
determamfidd

snowbouquet asked:

What's your opinion on there being "fake" and "real" fans/nerds?

neil-gaiman answered:

Until I meet any obviously fake human beings — and I think they’d have to be held together with glue, or have the eyes painted on, or really be dolls or slugs or something — I think all people, not to mention fans, nerds, geeks and suchlike are real.

Some people haven’t read/seen/done as much as others. Some people haven’t been around as long. Some people wear T-shirts without knowing everything about what the T-shirt represents. But they are still real, and (and this is the important bit) everybody starts somewhere. 

People at my signings sometimes tell me, apologetically, that they aren’t real fans, they’ve only read one book or a single comic, not like the people who know every obscure reference I make and win quizzes on my life and times that I would probably fail. And I tell them I’m glad they read the book. And I am.

greenekangaroo

what he said. 

'fake geek girls' accurate

See more posts like this on Tumblr

#'fake geek girls' #accurate

More you might like

not dead yet

Going through one of those periods where I remember that my mental health is so much better when I’m not on this site. I’m not entirely gone, and I still always wish I had people to talk to because I miss having close friends and fandom friends, so feel free to PM me contact info if you’d like to keep in touch off this site. Email, Discord, FB are probably the easiest places to get ahold of me, but let me know what other apps/sites you’d like to use to keep in touch, and I’ll do my best. The one thing I really hate about stepping back from tumblr is how it really does cut me off from the ability to talk to just about anyone about fandom/media stuff since I really don’t have any of that IRL.

So please say hello!

what is my life hiatus
leupagus
leupagus: “startrekdescribed: “fatfemmearoorc: “HAPPY FUCK OR DIE FRIDAY” [Image description: a black and white image showing Kirk and Spock from Star Trek: The Original Series. Both are pointing at a sign that says, “Pon Farr Night Fridays” on big...
fatfemmearoorc

HAPPY FUCK OR DIE FRIDAY

startrekdescribed

[Image description: a black and white image showing Kirk and Spock from Star Trek: The Original Series. Both are pointing at a sign that says, “Pon Farr Night Fridays” on big capital letters /end image description]

leupagus

So this is the main issue I have with image descriptions, which is that a very, very obviously photoshopped picture was not described as a very, very obviously photoshopped picture. And thus anyone who’s relying on grassroots image descriptions isn’t getting nearly enough information.

This is the original:

image

Which is exactly the same as the first picture, but instead says “Join the change-in Fridays” on the sign and was a promotion for their second season. This is very important context of the photoshopped image, because it’s been altered in order to tell a joke! A joke that was obvious (or… should have been) to people who could see the image! A funny joke!

But because image descriptions are just random people on the internet explaining what they see, and moreover prioritizing what they think is important about an image, there’s still a big disconnect.

star trek also the problem with image descriptions on this site is that most of you are bad at them and do them in a way that doesn't actually increase accessibility
See this in the app Show more